These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041246)
1. Matter of Spring. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Franklin North East Rep Second Ser; 1980 May; 405():115-24. PubMed ID: 12041246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Spring. Berson MI Medicoleg News; 1981 Jun; 9(3):2, 9. PubMed ID: 11645457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980). Lubinsky MS West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent. Nimz MM Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 10 Nov 1975. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division Atl Report; 1975; 348():801-24. PubMed ID: 11645911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights. Knezevich CA Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In the matter of George Clark. Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Matter of Storar; Eichner v. Dillon. New York. Court of Appeals North East Rep Second Ser; 1981 Mar; 420():64-80. PubMed ID: 12041255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quinlan, privacy, and the handling of incompetent dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):243-266. PubMed ID: 11661461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In Matter of Spring. 21 Dec 1979. Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Franklin North East Rep Second Ser; 1979; 399():493-504. PubMed ID: 12038350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Right to die (second of two parts): a set of fact sheets. Society for the Right to Die Conn Med; 1982 May; 46(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 11643762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Conroy. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]