192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041253)
1. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Plymouth
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Oct; 579():682-7. PubMed ID: 12041236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Guardianship of Matejski.
Iowa. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Feb; 419():576-82. PubMed ID: 12041141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re Eve.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Voluntary sterilization of the non-institutionalized mentally incompetent individual: judicial involvement or abstention?
Sachs LB
New Engl Law Rev; 1981-1982; 17(2):527-47. PubMed ID: 11658327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Terwilliger.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1982 Sep; 450():1376-86. PubMed ID: 11648535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Incompetency--Massachusetts applies substituted judgment to probate court sterilization proceedings--In re Moe, 385 Mass. 555, 432 N.E.2d 712 (1982).
Brewer PJ
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 11658782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A parent's right to seek sterilization for an incompetent minor.
Barron EJ
Forum; 1981; 16(5):1081-101. PubMed ID: 11649450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded.
Denkin JF
Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Matter of Guardianship of Eberhardy.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1981 Jun; 307():881-915. PubMed ID: 12041138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded.
Goldberg D
Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wisconsin Supreme Court rules sterilization of incompetent persons should be left to legislature.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1981; 5(6):397-8. PubMed ID: 11658284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally retarded--analysis of standards for judicial determinations.
Calibey KA
West New Engl Law Rev; 1981; 3(4):689-714. PubMed ID: 11658439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Addressing the consent issue involved in the sterilization of mentally incompetent females.
Davis DD
Albany Law Rev; 1979; 43(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11665120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization of the mentally retarded adult: the Eve case.
Starkman B
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):931-50. PubMed ID: 11650594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
