214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041256)
1. In re Estate of Prange.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Feb; 520():946-54. PubMed ID: 12041256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Estate of Longeway.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Estate of Greenspan.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1990 Jul; 558():1194-208. PubMed ID: 12041218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Drabick.
California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Gardner.
Maine. Supreme Judicial Court
Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():947-59. PubMed ID: 11648266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Grant ER; Cleaver CA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Living will" legislation in Illinois: what it could mean to doctor and patient.
King PD
Ill Bar J; 1984 Apr; 72(8):408-410, 412-413. PubMed ID: 11649772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutionalizing the "right to die".
Mayo TW
MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
Harber SM
Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Top Maine court backs right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():41. PubMed ID: 11646647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133.
Armstrong A
Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):553-68. PubMed ID: 11658968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
