214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041256)
21. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Guardianship of L.W.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Gardner.
Thompson LC
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 11644474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Zahn.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Opinion of the Attorney General No. 88-046.
Maryland. Office of the Attorney General
Opin Atty Gen State Md Md Atty Gen Off; 1988 Oct; 73():1-46. PubMed ID: 12041491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rasmussen v. Fleming.
Pollard CT
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The living will.
Ifrah AJ
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan.
Hoffmann DE
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
