These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041272)
1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1979 Dec; 612():84-135. PubMed ID: 11648475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981). Calvey FL Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst. Ferleger D; Scott PM West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions. Barbash F Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Youngberg v. Romeo. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Granting rights to the retarded. Will GF Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals. Meyer SM; Soskin RM J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital. 23 Dec 1977. U.S. District Court, e.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1977; 446():1295-329. PubMed ID: 11646079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The constitutional right to treatment services for the noncommitted mentally disabled. Esposito VM Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1980; 14(4):675-705. PubMed ID: 11651740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded. Gallo LV Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions. Kanter AS Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Romeo v. Youngberg. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation. Brant J J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scott v. Plante. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 691():634-9. PubMed ID: 11648511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Philipp v. Carey. U.S. District Court, N.D. New York Fed Suppl; 1981 Jun; 517():513-21. PubMed ID: 11648517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]