These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041272)

  • 41. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Federal court order brings big changes in lives of mentally ill and retarded patients in Alabama.
    Shils J
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1973 Dec; ():42. PubMed ID: 11649160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
    Murdock CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities.
    National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
    Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
    Estacio RA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Admission of AIDS patients to the long-term care facility: protections under federal and Washington State law.
    Roche RJ
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1988-1989; 24(1):85-106. PubMed ID: 11653893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Supreme Court and institutions: a comment on Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Ellis JW
    Ment Retard; 1982 Oct; 20(5):197-200. PubMed ID: 7176913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The rights of patients in nursing homes: when is there state action?
    Thomas BM
    GMU Law Rev; 1982; 5(2):315-37. PubMed ID: 11658685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
    Stone AA
    Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Wyatt v. Stickney: retrospect and prospect. Conference report.
    Byrne G
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Feb; 32(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 11643660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
    Barnett CF
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
    Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.