182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041273)
1. Youngberg v. Romeo.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
Meyer SM; Soskin RM
J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
Barbash F
Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Romeo v. Youngberg.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Granting rights to the retarded.
Will GF
Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
Gallo LV
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scott v. Plante.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 691():634-9. PubMed ID: 11648511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Herbert W
Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981).
Calvey FL
Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
Brant J
J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
Kanter AS
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1979 Dec; 612():84-135. PubMed ID: 11648475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
Winthrop LF
Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
