BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041275)

  • 1. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():416-75. PubMed ID: 12041275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
    Curry RE
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
    Crusius CJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Akron Center v. City of Akron.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1981 Jun; 651():1198-217. PubMed ID: 11648467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law--abortion--a requirement that "all" second trimester abortions shall be performed in a hospital is unconstitutional--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 51 U.S.L.W. 4767 (June 15, 1983).
    Colbert J
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1983 Fall-1984 Spring; 9(1-2):144-65. PubMed ID: 11655796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legacy of Justice William Brennan.
    Glendon MA; Treene EW
    Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 11660508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.: stare decisis prevails, but for how long?
    Prieto P
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 38(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 11655794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1985 May; 763():1532-60. PubMed ID: 11648355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right of privacy--mandatory hospitalization for all second trimester abortions invalidated as not being reasonably related to maternal health--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 103 S.Ct. 2481 (1983).
    Lim DG
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1984; 24(3):789-801. PubMed ID: 11655804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1986 Apr; 633():1123-45. PubMed ID: 11648374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproduction and the law.
    Erickson NS
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutionality of a city ordinance regulating the performance of abortion (city of Akron v. Akron Center of Reproductive Health). US Supreme Court, Decision Nos. 81746, 811172, June 15, 1983 (Supreme Court Reporter = S.Ct. 103 (1983, 2481-2517).
    Med Law; 1985; 4(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 4038540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.