These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041276)

  • 1. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 655():848-78. PubMed ID: 11648459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
    Curry RE
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Attorney General.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Mar; 677():101-14. PubMed ID: 12041240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simopoulos v. Virginia.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():506-22. PubMed ID: 12041277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():416-75. PubMed ID: 12041275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. 23 Jan 1980.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1980; 483():679-705. PubMed ID: 11646019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Bellotti.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Feb; 868():459-73. PubMed ID: 11648577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High court sets review on abortion.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 May; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.