These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041279)

  • 1. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 Mar; 111():1196-217. PubMed ID: 12041279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Sep; 886():871-921. PubMed ID: 11648148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal protection policies in the workplace: continuing controversy in light of Johnson Controls.
    Blank R
    Politics Life Sci; 1992 Aug; 11(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 11659520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal protection: law, ethics and corporate policy.
    Sprotzer I; Goldberg IV
    J Bus Ethics; 1992 Oct; 11(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 11652069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
    Paul EF
    Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
    Kilborn PT
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
    Peach LJ
    J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UAW v. Johnson Controls: gender discrimination in the fetotoxic workplace.
    Brown JW
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):479-529. PubMed ID: 11651453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court voids limits to women in jobs on basis of fetus.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11646829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
    Andrade VM
    Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII.
    Williams WW
    Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From the workplace to the delivery room: protecting the fetus in the post-Roe era.
    Maschke KJ
    Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11656400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
    Buss E
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. [26 September 1989].
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():148. PubMed ID: 12344152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1990 Feb; 267():158-78. PubMed ID: 11648150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can employers exclude women to protect children?
    Becker ME
    JAMA; 1990 Oct 24-31; 264(16):2113-7. PubMed ID: 2214080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
    Draper E
    Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reallocation of rights in industries with reproductive health hazards.
    Robinson JC; Giacomini MK
    Milbank Q; 1992; 70(4):587-603. PubMed ID: 1435627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting the baby: work in pregnancy poses legal frontier.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers v. American Cyanamid Co.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 741():444-50. PubMed ID: 11648145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.