These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Zbaraz v. Hartigan. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1985 May; 763():1532-60. PubMed ID: 11648355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barnes v. Mississippi. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1993 May; 992():1335-47. PubMed ID: 11648616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. States may require girl to notify parents before having abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: a new round. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub. U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana Fed Suppl; 1995 Oct; 905():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors. Schmidt CG N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge v. Camblos. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1997 Jun; 116():707-21. PubMed ID: 11648433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights? Sourial WH Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Glick v. McKay. U.S. District Court, D. Nevada Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 616():322-8. PubMed ID: 11648357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen. U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D Fed Suppl; 1986 Apr; 633():1123-45. PubMed ID: 11648374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wicklund v. Lambert. U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 979():1285-90. PubMed ID: 11648429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glick v. McKay. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1991 Jun; 937():434-43. PubMed ID: 11648595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: trouble ahead. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Zbaraz v. Hartigan. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1991 Oct; 776():375-86. PubMed ID: 11648407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wicklund v. Salvagni. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Fed Report; 1996 Aug; 93():567-72. PubMed ID: 11648425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1. Stuhlbarg SF Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]