These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041308)

  • 1. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Feb; 274():457-62. PubMed ID: 12041308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority: court-ordered surgery to protect the life of an unborn child.
    Finamore EP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 6638020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?
    Locke NJ
    Houst Law Rev; 1987 May; 24(3):549-76. PubMed ID: 11649225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
    Paris JJ
    Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wide appeal filed on forced Caesarean delivery.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
    Atl Report; 1987 Nov; 533():611-7. PubMed ID: 11648174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mama vs. fetus.
    Hornick HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re Baby Boy Doe.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Second Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 Apr; 632():326-35. PubMed ID: 12041260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.