These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041310)
1. Butler v. Brown. Georgia. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1982 Apr; 290():293-5. PubMed ID: 12041310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robinson v. Parrish. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 720():1548-52. PubMed ID: 11648163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robinson v. Parrish. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Sep; 306():922-4. PubMed ID: 12041314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dixon v. Peters. North Carolina. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Sep; 306():477-84. PubMed ID: 12041305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Halley v. Birbiglia. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital. Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Largey v. Rothman. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1988 May; 540():504-11. PubMed ID: 11648568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hook v. Rothstein. South Carolina. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Apr; 316():690-705. PubMed ID: 12041306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estate of Leach v. Shapiro. Ohio. Court of Appeals, Summit County North East Rep Second Ser; 1984 May; 469():1047-55. PubMed ID: 12041215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides. Dillon JR Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bulman v. Myers. Pennsylvania. Superior Court Atl Report; 1983 Nov; 467():1353-6. PubMed ID: 11648495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure. Chalmers D; Schwartz R Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Crain v. Allison. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1982 Apr; 443():558-66. PubMed ID: 11648159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hopp v. Lepp. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rogers v. Whitaker. Australia. High Court Aust Law J; 1993 Jan; 67(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 11648609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal. Morton JE Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doe v. Roe. Wisconsin. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jun; 444():437-43. PubMed ID: 12041133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]