These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041319)
21. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Conservatorship of Torres. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1984 Nov; 357():332-41. PubMed ID: 12041145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. British court allows terminally ill baby to die. Dyer C BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1398. PubMed ID: 11645006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Conroy. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Court ruling limits rights of patients: care deemed futile may be withheld. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Custody of a Minor. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Apr; 434():601-11. PubMed ID: 12041208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of families in medical decisions. Minow M Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In re Martin. Michigan. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1993 Jul; 504():917-28. PubMed ID: 12041148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc. Peters EA Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):543-50. PubMed ID: 11650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Rosebush. Michigan. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1992 Sep; 491():633-42. PubMed ID: 12041146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Which parents should give consent? French law and neonates involved in biomedical research. Byk C Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Apr; No. 137():19-21. PubMed ID: 11660664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care. Franklin C; Weil MH Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 11651359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. "No-sting" death: the final taboo. Marker RL Hum Life Rev; 1991; 17(4):7-29. PubMed ID: 11652622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. In re C.A. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Oct; 603():1171-94. PubMed ID: 12041205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Let my husband die": Michelle and Hugh Finn. Casey K Ladies Home J; 1999 Jul; 116(7):60, 62-64, 143. PubMed ID: 11658158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]