These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041368)

  • 21. People v. Privitera.
    Olson RE
    Human Rights; 1977; 6(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 11661736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Laetrile boom.
    Shimkin MB
    Skeptic; 1977; (21):. PubMed ID: 11662876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laetrile.
    Louisiana
    Revis Statut La; 1977; Section 40.676():40:676. PubMed ID: 12043687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laetrile: hope for cancer patients, or just a hoax?
    Young P
    Natl Obs; 1977 May; ():1+. PubMed ID: 11648753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors.
    Grumet BR
    Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gadler v. United States. 26 Jan 1977.
    U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 425():244-9. PubMed ID: 11645953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Politics and science in the Laetrile controversy.
    Petersen JC; Markle GE
    Soc Stud Sci; 1979 May; 9(2):139-66. PubMed ID: 11645793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Legalizing human guinea pigs.
    Stolfi JE
    N Y State J Med; 1977 Aug; 77(9):1388-9. PubMed ID: 11643527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legalize laetrile--never.
    Stolfi JE
    N Y State J Med; 1978 Mar; 78(4):575-6. PubMed ID: 11643530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laetrile wins one in federal court.
    Med World News; 1978 Aug; 19(16):25. PubMed ID: 11645367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laetrile--consumer protection is the bottom line.
    Martin DS
    Med World News; 1977 Jun; 18(13):56. PubMed ID: 11661484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patients who want Laetrile should get it from us!
    Alper PR
    Med Econ; 1978 Jul; 55(14):79-83. PubMed ID: 11645365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laetrile's day in court.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1979 Feb; 203(4380):528. PubMed ID: 11643489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laetrile, the continuing controversy.
    Carbone A
    Hosp Formul; 1978 Aug; 13(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 11645661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The judicial dilemma of Laetrile and a possible solution.
    Pendergast WR
    Mercer Law Rev; 1979; 30(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 11661827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laetrile: the battle moves into the courtroom.
    Schwartz RL
    Am Bar Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 65():224-8. PubMed ID: 11661617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Laetrile controversy: freedom of choice in medicines urged.
    Link M
    Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1977 Jul; 35(27):1346-8. PubMed ID: 11661613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Drugs--Federal Drug Administration ban on Laetrile treatments for terminally ill cancer patients is arbitrary and capricious.
    Bitting TH
    Tulsa Law J; 1978; 14():222-5. PubMed ID: 11662799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regulating Laetrile: constitutional and statutory implications.
    Patton-Hulce VR
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1980; 5(1):155-76. PubMed ID: 11661910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility.
    Volzer HJ
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.