These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation. Elliott FW Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent standardized to lessen suit risk. Med World News; 1982 May; 23(11):23-4. PubMed ID: 11645470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A procrustean approach to informed consent: the Texas Medical Disclosure Panel. Richards EP; Rathbun KC Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 6923126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care information technology and informed consent: computers and the doctor-patient relationship. Miller FH Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):1019-42. PubMed ID: 11660668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on the Texas standard for medical disclosure. Rachlin SK Houst Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 17(3):615-41. PubMed ID: 11658267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent in Oklahoma: a search for reasonableness and predictability in the aftermath of Scott v. Bradford. Fisher ES Oklahoma Law Rev; 1996; 49(4):651-75. PubMed ID: 16437817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and defenses to a lack of informed consent. Slovenko R J Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):441-70. PubMed ID: 15285074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimentation on human fetuses prohibited; medical procedures authorized; consent; approval; civil and criminal liability and proceedings; severability. Massachusetts Mass Gen Laws Annot Mass; 1976; Chapter 112 Section 12J 1976():. PubMed ID: 12041355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice: a subjective approach to informed consent in Oklahoma. Ivy K Tulsa Law J; 1980; 15(3):665-77. PubMed ID: 11665225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]