These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters. Meechan CM Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations. Baldwin ML UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany. Hertberg BL Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The regulation of fetal tissue transplantation. Morgan G Univ N S W Law J; 1991; 14(2):283-301. PubMed ID: 11659513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Planned Parenthood Association v. Fitzpatrick. 4 Sep 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1975; 401():554-94. PubMed ID: 11646052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 1 Jul 1976. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1976; 428():52-105. PubMed ID: 12038364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal experimentation: rights of the father and questions of personhood. Wilson JP Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 11664801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion -- impact on public health. Malkasian GD State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning. Markey K Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Hodgson v. Lawson. 6 Oct 1976. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1976; 542():1350-61. PubMed ID: 11646000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Akron decision: a pragmatic politician's parody of Solomon. Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(3):5-18. PubMed ID: 11655719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion Law of 1975. Illinois Smith-Hurd Ill Annot Statut Ill; 1979; Chapter 38 Sections 81.21 to 81.26():. PubMed ID: 12043651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Fetal tissue research: legal regulation of human fetal tissue transplantation. Gelfand G; Levin TR Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):647-94. PubMed ID: 11656327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]