126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041491)
1. Opinion of the Attorney General No. 88-046.
Maryland. Office of the Attorney General
Opin Atty Gen State Md Md Atty Gen Off; 1988 Oct; 73():1-46. PubMed ID: 12041491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Helping the hopelessly ill.
Landsman RM
Trusts Estates; 1988 Apr; 127(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11652539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The evanescence of living wills.
Francis LP
Real Property Probate Trust J; 1989; 24(1):141-64. PubMed ID: 11652557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The living will.
Ifrah AJ
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial nutrition and the terminally ill: how should Washington decide?
Beatty JA
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):419-57. PubMed ID: 11652503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Living will legislation in Colorado: an analysis of the Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act in relation to similar developments in other jurisdictions.
Marsh LA
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1987; 64(1):5-31. PubMed ID: 11652504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
Vitiello M
Miss Law J; 1984; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bartling v. Superior Court.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1984 Dec; 209():220-7. PubMed ID: 11648164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond the living will: making advance directives more useful.
Culver CM; Gert B
Omega (Westport); 1990; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11652562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The recent amendments to the Texas Natural Death Act: implications for health care providers.
Greenfield RE
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):1003-51. PubMed ID: 11652489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Fiori.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1995 Jan; 652():1350-81. PubMed ID: 11648286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
