These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041501)

  • 1. Motes v. Hall County.
    Georgia. Supreme Court
    Rep Cases Decided Supreme Court State Ga Ga Supreme Court; 1983 Sep; 251():373-5. PubMed ID: 12041501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
    Jaegers EM
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re Truesdell.
    North Carolina. Court of Appeals
    South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Jul; 304():793-813. PubMed ID: 12041322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
    Cepko R
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
    Coleman SS
    S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    Dugan JC
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
    Scott ES
    Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Apr; 518():789-94. PubMed ID: 11648518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Debra B.: the best interest standard in court-authorized sterilization of the mentally retarded.
    Donahue SM
    Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):209-32. PubMed ID: 11652532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Georgia Supreme Court invalidates involuntary sterilization statute.
    Harper TD
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 Nov; 72(11):795-7. PubMed ID: 6655381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--due process--North Carolina compulsory sterilization statute held constitutional against challenge that it constituted an unlawful invasion of privacy.
    Weathered F
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 8(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 11664735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eugenic sterilization--involuntary sterilization statute upheld as constitutional.
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 11664750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In re Hillstrom.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1985 Mar; 363():871-7. PubMed ID: 12041161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent.
    Comer D
    Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
    Burnett BA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
    Estacio RA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
    Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
    Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conservatorship of Valerie N.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1983 May; 191():283-90. PubMed ID: 11648539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matter of Moe.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.