172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041702)
1. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of images obtained with 1.0 and 1.5 Tesla units.
Yasui M; Ito K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 12041702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; McEntee G; MacMathuna P; Stack JP; Murray JG
Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):866-73. PubMed ID: 11069743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
Kim TK; Han JK; Kim SJ; Bae SH; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences.
Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tsuchigame T; Yamamoto H; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1297-303. PubMed ID: 8633435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative studies of breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) between different two sequences and between 1.0T and 1.5T units].
Yasui M; Honjo K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2849-53. PubMed ID: 9847608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.
Schindera ST; Miller CM; Ho LM; DeLong DM; Merkle EM
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 17507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at end expiration: a new technique to expand clinical application.
Chen JH; Chai JW; Chu WC; Chang JM; Shen WC; Lee SK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):593-6. PubMed ID: 12063947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualization of the biliary tract using gadobenate dimeglumine: preliminary findings.
Ergen FB; Akata D; Sarikaya B; Kerimoglu U; Hayran M; Akhan O; Hussain HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18303288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparing single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
Lee MG; Jeong YK; Kim MH; Lee SG; Kang EM; Chien D; Shin YM; Ha HK; Kim PN; Auh YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1539-45. PubMed ID: 9843285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Efficacy of respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo 3 dimensional-MR cholangiopancreatography on middle magnetic field MR imaging].
Isomoto I; Koshiishi T; Uetani M; Hayashi K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 57(4):170-5. PubMed ID: 9125872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality rating of MR-cholangiopancreatography with oral application of iron oxide particles].
Lorenzen M; Wedegärtner U; Fiehler J; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Jul; 175(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 12847648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Weber C; Kuhlencordt R; Grotelueschen R; Wedegaertner U; Ang TL; Adam G; Soehendra N; Seitz U
Endoscopy; 2008 Sep; 40(9):739-45. PubMed ID: 18698533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences.
Ichikawa T; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Mizutani Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 8797916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence.
Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Maruyama N; Kawahara T; Namimoto T; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 24105679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.
Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M; Sera Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9423593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
