These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12042416)
1. Bad behaviour does not equal research fraud. Williamson B J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):207; author reply 207. PubMed ID: 12042416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The discipline of science: law or profession? Davis M Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15991409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases. Mosimann JE IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal defenses to the use of data digits to identify fabricated data. Walter C; Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12012610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Misconduct in biomedical research]. de Jong JW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research. Jacobsen G; Hals A J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 8847683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. Farthing MJ Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Tang L Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7784):589-591. PubMed ID: 31768041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mundane misdeeds skew findings, researchers say. Dean C N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():F6. PubMed ID: 15966122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud. Jia H Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fraud in fundamental and clinical investigations. The necessity for an independent commission for scientific integrity]. Overbeke AJ Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):343-50; discussion 351-2. PubMed ID: 15641565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surge in number of 'extremely productive' authors concerns scientists. Conroy G Nature; 2024 Jan; 625(7993):14-15. PubMed ID: 38072985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of research institutions in management of scientific fraud: The example of Inserm Scientific Integrity delegation]. Bungener M; Hadchouel M Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):841-6. PubMed ID: 22727982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More South Korean academics caught naming kids as co-authors. Zastrow M Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7782):267-268. PubMed ID: 31719704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dishonesty in medical research. A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4]. Hals A; Jacobsen G Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Oct; 113(25):3149-52. PubMed ID: 8273040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of research quality guidelines in academic and nonacademic environments. Nobel JJ JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1435-7. PubMed ID: 2304221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]