These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12042850)

  • 1. GM crops and the pesticide paradigm.
    Welsh R; Hubbell B; Ervin DE; Jahn M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):548-9. PubMed ID: 12042850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rhône-Poulenc rounds up DeKalb and Monsanto.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1332. PubMed ID: 9415877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US groups sue over approval of Bt crops...as UK press reports come under fire.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6721):636-7. PubMed ID: 10067881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field.
    Gould F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10700135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory oversight in developing nations.
    Dirie AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 12042849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biotechnology in the modern world: benefits and risks].
    Blium IaB
    Tsitol Genet; 2002; 36(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 12012599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
    Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term evaluation of compliance with refuge requirements for Bt cotton.
    Carrière Y; Ellers-Kirk C; Kumar K; Heuberger S; Whitlow M; Antilla L; Dennehy TJ; Tabashnik BE
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Apr; 61(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 15714465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
    Gurian-Sherman D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GM advisory panel is slanted, say critics.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):7. PubMed ID: 10331376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):807-8. PubMed ID: 11533629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bt-resistance management--theory meets data.
    Gould F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1450-1. PubMed ID: 14647327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pest resistance feared as farmers flout rules.
    Clarke T
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):116. PubMed ID: 12853913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monsanto to face biopiracy charges in India.
    Laursen L
    Nat Biotechnol; 2012 Jan; 30(1):11. PubMed ID: 22231080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to Bt toxin surprisingly absent from pests.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):958-9. PubMed ID: 12949541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agency 'ignoring its advisers' over Bt maize.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):5. PubMed ID: 12621399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.