125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12042956)
1. Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis.
Martín G; Martín R; Brieva MJ; Santamaría L
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 12042956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions.
Wersebe A; Siegmann K; Krainick U; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Invest Radiol; 2002 Feb; 37(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 11799329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions.
Diebold T; Jacobi V; Scholz B; Hensel C; Solbach C; Kaufmann M; Viana F; Balzer J; Peters J; Vogl T
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 15649092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Level of suspicion of a mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with large-core breast biopsy.
Bérubé M; Curpen B; Ugolini P; Lalonde L; Ouimet-Oliva D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 9709675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial.
Stojadinovic A; Nissan A; Gallimidi Z; Lenington S; Logan W; Zuley M; Yeshaya A; Shimonov M; Melloul M; Fields S; Allweis T; Ginor R; Gur D; Shriver CD
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2703-15. PubMed ID: 15837985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical impedance scanning in breast tumor imaging: correlation with the growth pattern of lesion.
Wang K; Wang T; Fu F; Ji ZY; Liu RG; Liao QM; Dong XZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jul; 122(13):1501-6. PubMed ID: 19719937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology].
Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV).
Diebold T; Hahn T; Solbach C; Rody A; Balzer JO; Hansmann ML; Marx A; Viana F; Peters J; Jacobi V; Kaufmann M; Vogl TJ
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 15973139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.
Malich A; Böhm T; Facius M; Freessmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Dec; 37(18):2324-30. PubMed ID: 11720824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
