527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12043654)
41. Choosing how to die: the need for reform of Oregon's living will legislation.
Carey RL
Willamette Law Rev; 1987; 23(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 11652517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. In re Zahn.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
Harber SM
Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Life-sustaining procedures.
Louisiana
Revis Statut La; 1984; Sects. 1299.58.1 to 1299.58.10():. PubMed ID: 12038444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act.
Matthew DB
Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Personhood: current legal views.
Larson EJ
Second Opin; 1990 Jul; 14():41-53. PubMed ID: 11650425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Proposed state euthanasia statutes: a philosophical and legal analysis.
Kapner E
Hofstra Law Rev; 1975; 3(3):115-40. PubMed ID: 11661928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws.
Warnock HC
Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives.
Zinberg JM
Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Indiana's living wills and life-prolonging procedures act.
Kolb JB
Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(1):285-98. PubMed ID: 11649856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Termination of medical treatment: imminent legislative issues.
Robinson RC; Horan DJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1987; 31(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 11652516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The encouragment of empathy: just decisionmaking for incompetent terminal patients.
Oxman ML
J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):189-217. PubMed ID: 11652566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Right to die upheld for comatose patients.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11652365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The living will: the final expression.
Baker CH
Leg Med Q; 1980; 4(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 11649353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act.
Flannery EJ
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
