These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12043654)
61. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique. Williams JR Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Constitutionalizing the "right to die". Mayo TW MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. A new form of medical malpractice?: Missouri's "living will" statute. Murphy RE J Mo Bar; 1986; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11649874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy. Lyon EA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 11644074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Living wills and the right to die with dignity. Lanham D; Fehlberg B Melb Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 18(2):329-49. PubMed ID: 11651582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey. Rust M Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances. White PD Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Proxy decisionmaking for the terminally ill: the Virginia approach. O'Shaughnessy WJ Va Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 70(6):1269-302. PubMed ID: 11652483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Patient's right to terminate treatment. Delaware Del Code Annot Del; 1982; ChaPter 25 Sections 2501 to 2509():. PubMed ID: 12041443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. The right to die: a proposal for natural death legislation. Stephenson SA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):228-43. PubMed ID: 11658341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis. Steinle SJ Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. The judge. Rymer R Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1988; 2(3):54-62. PubMed ID: 11650164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis. Krasik EB Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards. Gilman GS Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Comparison of the living will statutes of the fifty states. Condie CJ J Contemp Law; 1988; 14(1):105-29. PubMed ID: 11650357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Beyond the living will: making advance directives more useful. Culver CM; Gert B Omega (Westport); 1990; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11652562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]