These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases. Christensen J Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Freedom of choice in medical treatment: reconsidering the efficacy requirement of the FDCA. Clinite BJ Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1977; 9(1):205-26. PubMed ID: 11661566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FDA treatment use regulations: a compassionate response. Weitzman SA; Marcy T AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):22-32. PubMed ID: 11650028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Laetrile, the continuing controversy. Carbone A Hosp Formul; 1978 Aug; 13(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 11645661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The judicial dilemma of Laetrile and a possible solution. Pendergast WR Mercer Law Rev; 1979; 30(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 11661827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Private rights to adulterated/misbranded articles. McMonagle L AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):33-49. PubMed ID: 11650029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Laetrile controversy: freedom of choice in medicines urged. Link M Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1977 Jul; 35(27):1346-8. PubMed ID: 11661613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why Laetrile won't go away. Edson L N Y Times Mag; 1977 p 41+; 27 Nov 1977():. PubMed ID: 11662576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Laetrile wins one in federal court. Med World News; 1978 Aug; 19(16):25. PubMed ID: 11645367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Laetrile: should it be banned? Clark Me Newsweek; 1977 Jun; 89(26):48-53+. PubMed ID: 11661577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. People v. Privitera: the right to prescribe and use Laetrile. Brandt EK West State Univ Law Rev; 1978; 5(2):201-229. PubMed ID: 11661590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Faith (healing), hope and charity at the FDA: the politics of AIDS drug trials. Annas GJ Villanova Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 34(5):771-97. PubMed ID: 11651162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility. Volzer HJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Drugs--Federal Drug Administration ban on Laetrile treatments for terminally ill cancer patients is arbitrary and capricious. Bitting TH Tulsa Law J; 1978; 14():222-5. PubMed ID: 11662799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laetrile: the battle moves into the courtroom. Schwartz RL Am Bar Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 65():224-8. PubMed ID: 11661617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rutherford v. United States. 8 Apr 1977. U.S. District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Fed Suppl; 1977; 429():506-13. PubMed ID: 11645917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Trial of experimental AIDS drug to be continued, with revisions. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1990 Mar; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]