These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12043733)
1. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. United States is paying more and getting less. Robson J BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Like should be compared with like. McIlwain CA BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Price adjustments falsify comparison. Himmelstein DU; Woolhandler S BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12039832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Kaiser may be model of American success or aberration. Schuur JD BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Use of OECD database has led to incorrect conclusions. Edwards N BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Working knowledge would have been needed for comparison. David DS BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Length of stay is not the problem. Bene JM BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7349):1332; author reply 1332. PubMed ID: 12043735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Authors' reply to getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Feachem RG; Sekhri N; White K BMJ; 2002 Jun; 324(7353):1583. PubMed ID: 12089101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lessons for the NHS from Kaiser Permanente. Shapiro J; Smith S BMJ; 2003 Nov; 327(7426):1241-2. PubMed ID: 14644937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Questioning the claims from Kaiser. Talbot-Smith A; Gnani S; Pollock AM; Gray DP Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jun; 54(503):415-21; discussion 422. PubMed ID: 15186560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning from Kaiser (part 2). Is integration the answer? Jewell D Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Aug; 54(505):571-3. PubMed ID: 15296553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can pay, won't pay. McFall T Nurs Times; 2000 Jun 22-28; 96(25):21. PubMed ID: 11962972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Staying Power. Ham C Health Serv J; 2006 Jul; 116(6013):26-8. PubMed ID: 16889275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Making the NHS more like Kaiser Permanente. Light D; Dixon M BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7442):763-5. PubMed ID: 15044296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hidden compromises in paying physicians. Berenson RA Bus Health; 1987 Jul; 4(9):18-9, 22. PubMed ID: 10282533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A look at Kaiser CEO's legacy. Faith in quality never waned. Interview by Patrick Mullen. Lawrence DM Manag Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):16-20, 21-2, 24-6. PubMed ID: 12098871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Market forces and health-care systems. Singer A Lancet; 1999 Sep; 354(9183):1037-8. PubMed ID: 10501401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Echoes across the Atlantic. Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9176):351. PubMed ID: 10437856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: competition made them do it. Enthoven AC BMJ; 2002 Jan; 324(7330):143. PubMed ID: 11822331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]