These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12043795)

  • 1. Model-based technique for the measurement of skin thickness in mammography.
    Katartzis A; Sahli H; Cornelis J; Fotopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2002 Mar; 40(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12043795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A digital equalisation technique improving visualisation of dense mammary gland and breast periphery in mammography.
    Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Skiadopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
    Eur J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 45(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 12536094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated and effective content-based image retrieval for digital mammography.
    Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 29480232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis.
    Costaridou L; Sakellaropoulos P; Stefanoyiannis AP; Ungureanu E; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):913-9. PubMed ID: 11675308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Independent component analysis and neural networks applied for classification of malignant, benign and normal tissue in digital mammography.
    Campos LF; Silva AC; Barros AK
    Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 17347758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast skin thickness: normal range and causes of thickening shown on film-screen mammography.
    Pope TL; Read ME; Medsker T; Buschi AJ; Brenbridge AN
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 6526847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
    Burgess AE; Kang H
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity.
    Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3367-74. PubMed ID: 16370424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of wavelet decomposition for image compression and feature preservation.
    Lo SC; Li H; Freedman MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1141-51. PubMed ID: 12956269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Method for Microcalcifications Detection in Breast Mammograms.
    Alasadi AH; Al-Saedi AK
    J Med Syst; 2017 Apr; 41(4):68. PubMed ID: 28284000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
    Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A novel ROI extracting technique based on wavelet transform for the detection of micro-calcifications in mammograms].
    Li S; Wan B; Ma Z; Wang R
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 15884554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition.
    Harvey JA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Dec; 3(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15560719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.