These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12044072)

  • 21. Land use and hydroclimatic influences on Faecal Indicator Organisms in two large Scottish catchments: towards land use-based models as screening tools.
    Tetzlaff D; Capell R; Soulsby C
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Sep; 434():110-22. PubMed ID: 22264920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.
    Edwards AC; Kay D; McDonald AT; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson JR; Wyer MD
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18179860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stormflow-dominated loads of faecal pollution from an intensively dairy-farmed catchment.
    Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Lydiard E
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1519-23. PubMed ID: 18520007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential E. coli die-off patterns associated with agricultural matrices.
    Oliver DM; Haygarth PM; Clegg CD; Heathwaite AL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(18):5710-6. PubMed ID: 17007130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A catchment-scale model to predict spatial and temporal burden of E. coli on pasture from grazing livestock.
    Oliver DM; Bartie PJ; Louise Heathwaite A; Reaney SM; Parnell JAQ; Quilliam RS
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 616-617():678-687. PubMed ID: 29111257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of cattle manure on erosion rates and runoff water pollution by faecal coliforms.
    Ramos MC; Quinton JN; Tyrrel SF
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jan; 78(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16111800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modelling the fate of faecal indicators in a coastal basin.
    Kashefipour SM; Lin B; Falconer RA
    Water Res; 2006 Apr; 40(7):1413-25. PubMed ID: 16537086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land.
    Collins R; Rutherford K
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 14723940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Faecal indicator pollution from a dairy farm in Ayrshire, Scotland: source apportionment, risk assessment and potential of mitigation measures.
    Vinten AJ; Sym G; Avdic K; Crawford C; Duncan A; Merrilees DW
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):997-1012. PubMed ID: 18001813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Faecal contamination over flood events in a pastoral agricultural stream in New Zealand.
    Nagels JW; Davies-Colley RJ; Donnison AM; Muirhead RW
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):45-52. PubMed ID: 12201126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A model framework to assess the effect of dairy farms and wild fowl on microbial water quality during base-flow conditions.
    Muirhead RW; Elliott AH; Monaghan RM
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2863-74. PubMed ID: 21453952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Waterfowl and the bacteriological quality of amenity ponds.
    Abulreesh HH; Paget TA; Goulder R
    J Water Health; 2004 Sep; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 15497814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationships between microbial water quality and environmental conditions in coastal recreational waters: the Fylde coast, UK.
    Crowther J; Kay D; Wyer MD
    Water Res; 2001 Dec; 35(17):4029-38. PubMed ID: 11791832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identifying pollutant sources in tidally mixed systems: case study of fecal indicator bacteria from marinas in Newport Bay, southern California.
    Jeong Y; Grant SB; Ritter S; Pednekar A; Candelaria L; Winant C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Dec; 39(23):9083-93. PubMed ID: 16382928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Climate, Hydrochemistry and Economics of Surface-water Systems (CHESS): adding a European dimension to the catchment modelling experience developed under LOIS.
    Boorman DB
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Oct; 314-316():411-37. PubMed ID: 14499543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Roadside ditches as conduits of fecal indicator organisms and sediment: implications for water quality management.
    Falbo K; Schneider RL; Buckley DH; Walter MT; Bergholz PW; Buchanan BP
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():1050-9. PubMed ID: 23933218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of tillage and poultry manure application rates on Salmonella and fecal indicator bacteria concentrations in tiles draining Des Moines Lobe soils.
    Hruby CE; Soupir ML; Moorman TB; Shelley M; Kanwar RS
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 171():60-69. PubMed ID: 26874615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microbial source tracking to identify human and ruminant sources of faecal pollution in an ephemeral Florida river.
    Chase E; Hunting J; Staley C; Harwood VJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 113(6):1396-406. PubMed ID: 22963043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments.
    Buck O; Niyogi DK; Townsend CR
    Environ Pollut; 2004 Jul; 130(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 15158041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.