BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12045084)

  • 1. Low prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis by urinary ligase chain reaction in women patients in the emergency department.
    Doezema D; Hepworth E; Young SA; Arguelles CA; Brillman JC; Tandberg D
    Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 9(6):646-9. PubMed ID: 12045084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by urine tests among adolescents clinics.
    Beck-Sague CM; Farshy CE; Jackson TK; Guillory L; Edelkind D; Bullard JC; Urdez EA; Jones B; Francis K; Sievert A; Morse SA; Black CM
    J Adolesc Health; 1998 Mar; 22(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 9502006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between urine and cervical specimens for the detection of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using ligase chain reaction in a cohort of HIV infected and uninfected adolescents.
    Peralta L; Durako SJ; Ma Y;
    J Adolesc Health; 2001 Sep; 29(3 Suppl):87-92. PubMed ID: 11530308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical, urine and vaginal specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction in women: a comparison.
    Hjelm E; Hallén A; Domeika M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001; 81(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11720178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics.
    Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Quinn TC; Gaydos JC; McKee KT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1300-4. PubMed ID: 9574695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and vaginal swabs and urine specimens from women undergoing termination of pregnancy.
    Renton A; Thomas BM; Gill S; Lowndes C; Taylor-Robinson D; Patterson K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Jul; 17(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 16820072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening.
    Buimer M; van Doornum GJ; Ching S; Peerbooms PG; Plier PK; Ram D; Lee HH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):2395-400. PubMed ID: 8880487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the urine-based ligase chain reaction test to culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pediatric sexual abuse victims.
    Girardet RG; McClain N; Lahoti S; Cheung K; Hartwell B; McNeese M
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2001 Feb; 20(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 11224831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisite pooling study using ligase chain reaction in screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Clark AM; Steece R; Crouse K; Campbell J; Zanto S; Kartchner D; Mottice S; Pettit D
    Sex Transm Dis; 2001 Oct; 28(10):565-8. PubMed ID: 11689754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.
    Black CM; Marrazzo J; Johnson RE; Hook EW; Jones RB; Green TA; Schachter J; Stamm WE; Bolan G; St Louis ME; Martin DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 40(10):3757-63. PubMed ID: 12354877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
    de Barbeyrac B; Rodriguez P; Dutilh B; Le Roux P; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.
    Bassiri M; Hu HY; Domeika MA; Burczak J; Svensson LO; Lee HH; Mårdh PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):898-900. PubMed ID: 7790456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
    Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of genitourinary tract Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women by ligase chain reaction assay.
    Andrews WW; Lee HH; Roden WJ; Mott CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 9083312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction.
    Jensen IP; Fogh H; Prag J
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Mar; 9(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12667251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.
    van Doornum GJ; Buimer M; Prins M; Henquet CJ; Coutinho RA; Plier PK; Tomazic-Allen S; Hu H; Lee H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Aug; 33(8):2042-7. PubMed ID: 7559945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.
    Mahony J; Chong S; Jang D; Luinstra K; Faught M; Dalby D; Sellors J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3122-6. PubMed ID: 9774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Ligase chain reaction testing of pooled urine specimens to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection].
    Sánchez-Alemán MA; Gutiérrez JP; Bertozzi SM; Frontela-Noda M; Guerrero-Lemus V; Conde-González CJ
    Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 16315639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.
    Chernesky MA; Jang D; Sellors J; Luinstra K; Chong S; Castriciano S; Mahony JB
    Mol Cell Probes; 1997 Aug; 11(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9281409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.