These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12046405)

  • 21. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Digital subtraction technique in dentistry].
    Bottenberg P; Truyen B; Boca C
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18506962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of digital image analysis in dental radiography for the description of periapical bone lesions: a preliminary study.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):357-9. PubMed ID: 1855798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of photodensitometric with high-resolution digital analysis of bone density from serial dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes A; Pun T; Cimasoni G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1397451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Analysis of alveolar bone].
    Taguchi A
    Clin Calcium; 2007 Feb; 17(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 17272876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnosing periapical bone lesions on radiographs by means of texture analysis.
    Mol A; Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Jun; 73(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 1437047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cigarette smoking and alveolar bone in young adults: a study using digitized radiographs.
    Rosa GM; Lucas GQ; Lucas ON
    J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 18251656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of computer-aided image interpretation to the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 1299632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of simulated periodontal bone gain by digital subtraction radiography with tuned-aperture computed tomography. The effect of angular disparity.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11313728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 11373732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Digital subtraction radiography technique in oral diagnosis].
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Braegger U; Lang NP
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Oct; 43(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 2518067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computerized densitometric analysis of interproximal bone levels in a controlled clinical study into the treatment of periodontal bone defects with ceramic hydroxyapatite implant material.
    Galgut PN; Verrier J; Waite IM; Linney A; Cornick DE
    J Periodontol; 1991 Jan; 62(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 1848289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.