These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12046609)
1. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions. Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation]. Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids. Politi E; Kandaraki C; Apostolopoulou C; Kyritsi T; Koutselini H Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15690338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry. Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ber-EP4 for differentiating adenocarcinoma from reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen, B72.3 and Leu-M1. Bailey ME; Brown RW; Mody DR; Cagle P; Ramzy I Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8960030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calretinin, thrombomodulin, CEA, and CD15: a useful combination of immunohistochemical markers for differentiating pleural epithelial mesothelioma from peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Comin CE; Novelli L; Boddi V; Paglierani M; Dini S Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 11381372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry. Joseph MG; Banerjee D; Harris P; Gibson S; McFadden RG Mod Pathol; 1995 Aug; 8(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 8532707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the role of hyaluronic acid and CD44 localization. Afify AM; Stern R; Michael CW Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15690337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image cytometry: an aid for cytological diagnosis of pleural effusions. Osterheld MC; Liette C; Anca M Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15690335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Hasteh F; Lin GY; Weidner N; Michael CW Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 20209622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. D2-40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions. Bassarova AV; Nesland JM; Davidson B Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 16819331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytology, immunopathology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions. Croonen AM; van der Valk P; Herman CJ; Lindeman J Lab Invest; 1988 Jun; 58(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 3288807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology. Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma. Differentiation of mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Ordóñez NG Am J Surg Pathol; 1989 Apr; 13(4):276-91. PubMed ID: 2648877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image analysis and flow cytometric DNA studies of benign and malignant body cavity fluids: reappraisal of the role of current methods in the differential diagnosis of reactive versus malignant conditions. Lazcano O; Chen LM; Tsai C; Li CY; Katzmann JA; Sebo TJ; Kimlinger TK; Baker J Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 10912939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology. Ko EC; Jhala NC; Shultz JJ; Chhieng DC Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11710688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Podoplanin is a useful marker for identifying mesothelioma in malignant effusions. Hanna A; Pang Y; Bedrossian CW; Dejmek A; Michael CW Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 38(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 20146302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of effusions: use of logistic regression to select a panel of antibodies to distinguish adenocarcinomas from mesothelial proliferations. Frisman DM; McCarthy WF; Schleiff P; Buckner SB; Nocito JD; O'Leary TJ Mod Pathol; 1993 Mar; 6(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 8483888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: A logistic regression analysis. Cakir E; Demirag F; Aydin M; Unsal E Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 18973123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinction between carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry. Tickman RJ; Cohen C; Varma VA; Fekete PS; DeRose PB Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(4):491-6. PubMed ID: 2197840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]