1371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12046609)
1. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids.
Politi E; Kandaraki C; Apostolopoulou C; Kyritsi T; Koutselini H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15690338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ber-EP4 for differentiating adenocarcinoma from reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen, B72.3 and Leu-M1.
Bailey ME; Brown RW; Mody DR; Cagle P; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8960030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calretinin, thrombomodulin, CEA, and CD15: a useful combination of immunohistochemical markers for differentiating pleural epithelial mesothelioma from peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Comin CE; Novelli L; Boddi V; Paglierani M; Dini S
Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 11381372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.
Joseph MG; Banerjee D; Harris P; Gibson S; McFadden RG
Mod Pathol; 1995 Aug; 8(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 8532707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the role of hyaluronic acid and CD44 localization.
Afify AM; Stern R; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15690337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image cytometry: an aid for cytological diagnosis of pleural effusions.
Osterheld MC; Liette C; Anca M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15690335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions.
Hasteh F; Lin GY; Weidner N; Michael CW
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 20209622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. D2-40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions.
Bassarova AV; Nesland JM; Davidson B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 16819331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytology, immunopathology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Croonen AM; van der Valk P; Herman CJ; Lindeman J
Lab Invest; 1988 Jun; 58(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 3288807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.
Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma. Differentiation of mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma.
Ordóñez NG
Am J Surg Pathol; 1989 Apr; 13(4):276-91. PubMed ID: 2648877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image analysis and flow cytometric DNA studies of benign and malignant body cavity fluids: reappraisal of the role of current methods in the differential diagnosis of reactive versus malignant conditions.
Lazcano O; Chen LM; Tsai C; Li CY; Katzmann JA; Sebo TJ; Kimlinger TK; Baker J
Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 10912939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology.
Ko EC; Jhala NC; Shultz JJ; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Podoplanin is a useful marker for identifying mesothelioma in malignant effusions.
Hanna A; Pang Y; Bedrossian CW; Dejmek A; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 38(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 20146302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of effusions: use of logistic regression to select a panel of antibodies to distinguish adenocarcinomas from mesothelial proliferations.
Frisman DM; McCarthy WF; Schleiff P; Buckner SB; Nocito JD; O'Leary TJ
Mod Pathol; 1993 Mar; 6(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 8483888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: A logistic regression analysis.
Cakir E; Demirag F; Aydin M; Unsal E
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 18973123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinction between carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry.
Tickman RJ; Cohen C; Varma VA; Fekete PS; DeRose PB
Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(4):491-6. PubMed ID: 2197840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
