106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12047058)
1. Children's reading of words, pseudohomophones, and other nonwords.
Laxon V; Masterson J; Gallagher A; Pay J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):543-65. PubMed ID: 12047058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case-mixing effects on children's word recognition: lexical feedback and development.
Mayall K
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):525-42. PubMed ID: 12047057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Looks aren't everything: pseudohomophones prime words but nonwords do not.
Huntsman LA
J Psycholinguist Res; 2007 Jan; 36(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 17221320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: evidence from children learning to read German.
Wimmer H
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Feb; 61(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 8812031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonword naming: further exploration of the pseudohomophone effect in terms of orthographic neighborhood size, graphemic changes, spelling-sound consistency, and reader accuracy.
Laxon V; Masterson J; Pool M; Keating C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):730-48. PubMed ID: 1385613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reading aloud pseudohomophones in Italian: always an advantage.
Peressotti F; Colombo L
Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):466-82. PubMed ID: 22131251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.
Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):951-61. PubMed ID: 12219801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.
Bowey JA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):186-214. PubMed ID: 18054365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning to read and spell in Persian: a cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4.
Rahbari N; Sénéchal M
Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 46(6):1514-27. PubMed ID: 20677856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verification of nonwords: The baseword frequency effect in children's pseudohomophone reading.
Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2289-2294. PubMed ID: 29330681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferring sublexical correspondences from sight vocabulary: evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds.
Stuart M; Masterson J; Dixon M; Quinlan P
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 10371874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical.
Thorn AS; Frankish CR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):729-35. PubMed ID: 16060776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lexical stress, frequency, and stress neighbourhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development.
Sulpizio S; Colombo L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):2073-84. PubMed ID: 23590549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not all nonwords are alike: implications for reading development and theory.
Treiman R; Goswami U; Bruck M
Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 2266857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2- to 4-year-olds: evidence from typically developing children.
Roy P; Chiat S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):223-34. PubMed ID: 15072541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic processes in reading: a critical review of pseudohomophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account.
Reynolds M; Besner D
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):622-46. PubMed ID: 16447376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
