These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12047062)

  • 21. Evidence for a dissociation of structural and semantic knowledge in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT).
    Hajilou BB; Done DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):810-6. PubMed ID: 17034821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Janssen N; Schirm W; Mahon BZ; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 18194068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual word recognition: evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback.
    Robidoux S; Stolz J; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):689-703. PubMed ID: 20515198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural correlates of implicit object identification.
    Pins D; Meyer ME; Foucher J; Humphreys G; Boucart M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1247-59. PubMed ID: 15178176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual load alters visual excitability.
    Carmel D; Thorne JD; Rees G; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21728464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional spread in deaf and hearing participants: face and object distractor processing under perceptual load.
    Hauthal N; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1312-20. PubMed ID: 22638944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual and cognitive load interact to control the spatial focus of attention.
    Linnell KJ; Caparos S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1643-8. PubMed ID: 21767051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the Navon paradigm.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 22872549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Global shape cannot be attended without object identification.
    Boucart M; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):785-806. PubMed ID: 1500876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An enquiry into the process of categorization of pictures and words.
    Viswanathan M; Childers TL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):267-87. PubMed ID: 12705535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual load improves the expression but not learning of relevant sequence information.
    Deroost N; Coomans D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 19261583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reduced or increased influence of non-pertinent information in patients with schizophrenia?
    Giersch A; Danion JM; Boucart M; Roeser C; Abenhaim K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Sep; 111(2):171-90. PubMed ID: 12227434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic and affective salience: the role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement.
    Biggs AT; Kreager RD; Gibson BS; Villano M; Crowell CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 22390289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What eye fixation patterns tell us about subitizing.
    Sophian C; Crosby ME
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(3):394-409. PubMed ID: 18473205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elaborative processing of pictures in verbal domains.
    Marks W
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 2811663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hypnotic susceptibility, imaging ability, and the detection of embedded words within letters.
    Wallace B; Allen PA; Weber TA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Jan; 42(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 8112925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.