481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12048624)
41. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Multislice spiral CT colonography in the evaluation of colorectal neoplasms.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Trenna S; Mangiapane F; Sinibaldi G; Piacentini F; Sammartino P; Stipa V; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2002; 104(5-6):394-403. PubMed ID: 12589260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Finding polyps at colonoscopy previously noted on CT colonography.
Waye JD
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Apr; 20(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 20451818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. CT colonography for detection and characterisation of synchronous proximal colonic lesions in patients with stenosing colorectal cancer.
Park SH; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim JC; Yu CS; Kim HC; Ye BD; Kim MJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Gut; 2012 Dec; 61(12):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22115824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery.
Weinberg DS; Pickhardt PJ; Bruining DH; Edwards K; Fletcher JG; Gollub MJ; Keenan EM; Kupfer SS; Li T; Lubner SJ; Markowitz AJ; Ross EA
Gastroenterology; 2018 Mar; 154(4):927-934.e4. PubMed ID: 29174927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Diagnostic efficiency of multislice computed tomography colonography in the detection of colorectal tumors: comparison with conventional colonography].
Bakir B; Yekeler E; Tunaci M; Tunaci A; Acunaş B; Acunaş G
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):218-29. PubMed ID: 15470625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery.
Neri E; Turini F; Cerri F; Faggioni L; Vagli P; Naldini G; Bartolozzi C
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 19763682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.
Sha J; Chen J; Lv X; Liu S; Chen R; Zhang Z
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 May; 20(1):51. PubMed ID: 32423413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy.
Neri E; Giusti P; Battolla L; Vagli P; Boraschi P; Lencioni R; Caramella D; Bartolozzi C
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 12034925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for detection of colorectal polyps].
Pfeifer GK; Corleta O; Gus P
Arq Gastroenterol; 2008; 45(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 19148358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of multidetector computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps and cancer.
Kalra N; Suri S; Bhasin DK; Sinha SK; Saravanan N; Kour T; Vaiphei K; Wig JD
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2006; 25(5):229-32. PubMed ID: 17090838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patients with polyps larger than 5 mm in computed tomography colonoscopy screening have high risk for advanced colonic neoplasia in Asia.
Sung JJ; Luo DJ; Ng SS; Lau JY; Tsoi KK;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20955818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Yun JY; Ro HJ; Park JB; Choi JB; Chung JE; Kim YJ; Suh WH; Lee JK
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 18071278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients.
Yee J; Akerkar GA; Hung RK; Steinauer-Gebauer AM; Wall SD; McQuaid KR
Radiology; 2001 Jun; 219(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 11376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.
Eliakim R; Yassin K; Niv Y; Metzger Y; Lachter J; Gal E; Sapoznikov B; Konikoff F; Leichtmann G; Fireman Z; Kopelman Y; Adler SN
Endoscopy; 2009 Dec; 41(12):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19967618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Fenlon HM; Nunes DP; Schroy PC; Barish MA; Clarke PD; Ferrucci JT
N Engl J Med; 1999 Nov; 341(20):1496-503. PubMed ID: 10559450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CT-colonography in the follow-up of acute diverticulitis: patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy.
Chabok A; Smedh K; Nilsson S; Stenson M; Påhlman L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):979-86. PubMed ID: 23834748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
