These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12049242)

  • 1. Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory.
    Kroll NE; Yonelinas AP; Dobbins IG; Frederick CM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):241-54. PubMed ID: 12049242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks.
    Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Bradford A; Ahmed S
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 15817188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms.
    Smith DG; Duncan MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 15099130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition memory probes affect what is remembered in schizophrenia.
    Schwartz BL; Parker ES; Rosse RB; Deutsch SI
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 May; 167(1-2):21-7. PubMed ID: 19339054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: total score and response time cutoffs developed on "real world" credible and noncredible subjects.
    Kim MS; Boone KB; Victor T; Marion SD; Amano S; Cottingham ME; Ziegler EA; Zeller MA
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 25(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 19906738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.
    Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb; 136(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 17324082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
    Willner P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?
    Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Roberts N; Cezayirli E; Isaac CL; O'Reilly RC; Norman KA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.
    Yonelinas AP; Parks CM
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):800-32. PubMed ID: 17723031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of inadequate effort on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second edition: forced choice recognition and critical item analysis.
    Root JC; Robbins RN; Chang L; VAN Gorp WG
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Sep; 12(5):688-96. PubMed ID: 16961950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response reversals in recognition memory.
    Van Zandt T; Maldonado-Molina MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1147-66. PubMed ID: 15521795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When memory does not fail: familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
    Westerberg CE; Paller KA; Weintraub S; Mesulam MM; Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Reber PJ
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Mar; 20(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16594780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: evidence for single-system models.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Jessup NM; Unverzagt FW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Mar; 9(3):394-406. PubMed ID: 12666764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: a constraint on item-noise interference models.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1331-55. PubMed ID: 23234500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants of capacious memory: a process-dissociation and experiential approach.
    Dubuc S; Karlsson T; Lalonde R
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Jul; 46(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 15842412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blindsight and visual awareness.
    Azzopardi P; Cowey A
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Sep; 7(3):292-311. PubMed ID: 9787046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.