These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12049283)

  • 1. Transfer of learning across durations and ears in auditory frequency discrimination.
    Delhommeau K; Micheyl C; Jouvent R; Collet L
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Apr; 64(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 12049283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalization of frequency discrimination learning across frequencies and ears: implications for underlying neural mechanisms in humans.
    Delhommeau K; Micheyl C; Jouvent R
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15834630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency discrimination training: is there ear symmetry?
    Roth DA; Avrahami T; Sabo Y; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):15-27. PubMed ID: 15485127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How specific is the learning in an auditory frequency discrimination task?
    Zaltz Y; Ari-Even Roth D; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 22(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 22865365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of training on frequency discrimination: generalization to untrained frequencies and to the untrained ear.
    Ari-Even Roth D; Amir O; Alaluf L; Buchsenspanner S; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2003; 14(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 14558728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalization to untrained conditions following training with identical stimuli.
    Roth DA; Appelbaum M; Milo C; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2008; 19(3-4):223-36. PubMed ID: 19025033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rats' (Rattus norvegicus) temporal discrimination of brief auditory stimuli: how does it compare with that of humans (Homo sapiens) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)?
    Tremblay J; Cohen J; Weisman RG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17980973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological implications of interaural correlation: count heads not ears.
    Coren S; Hakstian AR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Sep; 48(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2216657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning to perceive pitch differences.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11931315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual learning: how much daily training is enough?
    Wright BA; Sabin AT
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):727-36. PubMed ID: 17333009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing.
    Buus S; Scharf B; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 6747115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of interaural differences of time in the envelopes of high-frequency signals: integration times.
    Buell TN; Hafter ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Dec; 84(6):2063-6. PubMed ID: 3225351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related differences in discrimination of an interval separating onsets of successive tone bursts as a function of interval duration.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S; Barrett J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):458-66. PubMed ID: 17614503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.
    Lister J; Besing J; Koehnke J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2793-800. PubMed ID: 12083214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.
    Amitay S; Hawkey DJ; Moore DR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 May; 67(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 16134462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination.
    Micheyl C; Delhommeau K; Perrot X; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Sep; 219(1-2):36-47. PubMed ID: 16839723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans.
    Wright BA; Buonomano DV; Mahncke HW; Merzenich MM
    J Neurosci; 1997 May; 17(10):3956-63. PubMed ID: 9133413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.