These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12049288)

  • 1. Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition.
    Kumada T; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Apr; 64(3):493-503. PubMed ID: 12049288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding priming of color-singleton search: roles of attention at encoding and "retrieval".
    Goolsby BA; Suzuki S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):929-44. PubMed ID: 11578055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.
    Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets.
    Cohen A; Magen H
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 10089762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.
    Maljkovic V; Nakayama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):977-91. PubMed ID: 8920835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-determined discrimination mechanisms for color search.
    Olds ES; Cowan WB; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1038-45. PubMed ID: 10497425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
    Hodsoll J; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 11521856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 19082623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.
    Müller HJ; Heller D; Ziegler J
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jan; 57(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 7885801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 15912874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.
    Koshino H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 11495117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor eccentricity and its effect on selective attention.
    Chen Z
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 18444518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.