These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

889 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12050500)

  • 1. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of post-radical prostatectomy pathological outcome for stage T1c prostate cancer with percent free prostate specific antigen: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.
    Southwick PC; Catalona WJ; Partin AW; Slawin KM; Brawer MK; Flanigan RC; Patel A; Richie JP; Walsh PC; Scardino PT; Lange PH; Gasior GH; Parson RE; Loveland KG
    J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1346-51. PubMed ID: 10492194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer.
    Fowler JE; Bigler SA; Miles D; Yalkut DA
    J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 10687983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
    Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percent free prostate specific antigen is not an independent predictor of organ confinement or prostate specific antigen recurrence in unscreened patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Huland E; Scardino PT; Kattan MW; Huland H
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1306-9. PubMed ID: 11832719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of predictive accuracy for pathologically organ confined clinical stage T1c prostate cancer using human glandular kallikrein 2 and prostate specific antigen combined with clinical stage and Gleason grade.
    Haese A; Vaisanen V; Lilja H; Kattan MW; Rittenhouse HG; Pettersson K; Chan DW; Huland H; Sokoll LJ; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15711262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
    Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in men with long-term follow-up postprostatectomy using quantitative nuclear morphometry.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Isharwal S; Marlow C; Makarov DV; Partin AW
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Jan; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 18199716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting pathological stage of localized prostate cancer using volume weighted mean nuclear volume.
    Fujikawa K; Matsui Y; Kobayashi T; Miura K; Oka H; Fukuzawa S; Takeuchi H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1587-90. PubMed ID: 11025710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
    Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative nuclear morphometry, Markovian texture descriptors, and DNA content captured on a CAS-200 Image analysis system, combined with PCNA and HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry for prediction of prostate cancer progression.
    Veltri RW; Partin AW; Epstein JE; Marley GM; Miller CM; Singer DS; Patton KP; Criley SR; Coffey DS
    J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():249-58. PubMed ID: 7529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M; Haese A; Pichlmeier U; Hammerer PG; Noldus J; Butz K; Erbersdobler A; Henke RP; Michl U; Fernandez S; Huland H
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):857-63. PubMed ID: 11176486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.