583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12050555)
1. Comparison of [18 F]fluorocholine and [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose for positron emission tomography of androgen dependent and androgen independent prostate cancer.
Price DT; Coleman RE; Liao RP; Robertson CN; Polascik TJ; DeGrado TR
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 12050555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.
DeGrado TR; Coleman RE; Wang S; Baldwin SW; Orr MD; Robertson CN; Polascik TJ; Price DT
Cancer Res; 2001 Jan; 61(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 11196147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Synthesis and evaluation of (18)F-labeled choline analogs as oncologic PET tracers.
DeGrado TR; Baldwin SW; Wang S; Orr MD; Liao RP; Friedman HS; Reiman R; Price DT; Coleman RE
J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1805-14. PubMed ID: 11752077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of PET tracer uptake in hormone-independent and hormone-dependent xenograft prostate cancer mouse models.
Kukuk D; Reischl G; Raguin O; Wiehr S; Judenhofer MS; Calaminus C; Honndorf VS; Quintanilla-Martinez L; Schönberger T; Duchamp O; Machulla HJ; Pichler BJ
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1654-63. PubMed ID: 21859811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pairwise comparison of 18F-FDG and 18F-FCH PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with rising PSA and known or suspected second malignancy.
How Kit N; Dugué AE; Sevin E; Allouache N; Lesaunier F; Joly F; Aide N
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 26642435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of hypoxia on the uptake of [methyl-3H]choline, [1-14C] acetate and [18F]FDG in cultured prostate cancer cells.
Hara T; Bansal A; DeGrado TR
Nucl Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 33(8):977-84. PubMed ID: 17127170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of the Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases: Is It Feasible to Compare 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and 99mTc-methyl Diphosphonate Bone Scintigraphy?
Pietrzak AK; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Urol J; 2018 Sep; 15(5):242-247. PubMed ID: 29681049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-choline images murine atherosclerotic plaques ex vivo.
Matter CM; Wyss MT; Meier P; Späth N; von Lukowicz T; Lohmann C; Weber B; Ramirez de Molina A; Lacal JC; Ametamey SM; von Schulthess GK; Lüscher TF; Kaufmann PA; Buck A
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2006 Mar; 26(3):584-9. PubMed ID: 16357314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of the choline transport tracer deshydroxy-[18F]fluorocholine ([18F]dOC).
Henriksen G; Herz M; Hauser A; Schwaiger M; Wester HJ
Nucl Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 31(7):851-8. PubMed ID: 15464386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [PET/CT with (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG in patients with elevated PSA after radical treatment of a prostate cancer].
García JR; Soler M; Blanch MA; Ramírez I; Riera E; Lozano P; Pérez X; Delgado E; Carrio I; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2009; 28(3):95-100. PubMed ID: 19558948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot comparison of F-fluorocholine and F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT with conventional imaging in prostate cancer.
Beauregard JM; Williams SG; Degrado TR; Roselt P; Hicks RJ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Aug; 54(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 20718912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-fluorocholine versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for PET/CT imaging in patients with suspected relapsing or progressive multiple myeloma: a pilot study.
Cassou-Mounat T; Balogova S; Nataf V; Calzada M; Huchet V; Kerrou K; Devaux JY; Mohty M; Talbot JN; Garderet L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1995-2004. PubMed ID: 27121691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How we read FCH-PET/CT for prostate cancer.
Beauregard JM; Beaulieu A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Dec; 16(1):41. PubMed ID: 27923396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 18F-RB390: innovative ligand for imaging the T877A androgen receptor mutant in prostate cancer via positron emission tomography (PET).
Bertolini R; Goepfert C; Andrieu T; Nichols S; Walter MA; Frey FJ; McCammon JA; Frey BM
Prostate; 2015 Mar; 75(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 25358634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-based targeting using bombesin analogues is superior to metabolism-based targeting using choline for in vivo imaging of human prostate cancer xenografts.
Schroeder RP; van Weerden WM; Krenning EP; Bangma CH; Berndsen S; Grievink-de Ligt CH; Groen HC; Reneman S; de Blois E; Breeman WA; de Jong M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Jul; 38(7):1257-66. PubMed ID: 21431398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 9:30-9:45. Preliminary Evaluation of F-18 Fluorocholine (FCH) as a PET Tumor Imaging Agent.
Coleman R; DeGrado T; Wang S; Baldwin S; Orr M; Reiman R; Price D
Clin Positron Imaging; 2000 Jul; 3(4):147. PubMed ID: 11150750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of meta-analyses among elastosonography (ES) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging techniques in the application of prostate cancer diagnosis.
Ouyang Q; Duan Z; Lei J; Jiao G
Tumour Biol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):2999-3007. PubMed ID: 26415734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate cancer localization with 18fluorine fluorocholine positron emission tomography.
Kwee SA; Coel MN; Lim J; Ko JP
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):252-5. PubMed ID: 15592091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.
Beheshti M; Vali R; Waldenberger P; Fitz F; Nader M; Loidl W; Broinger G; Stoiber F; Foglman I; Langsteger W
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Oct; 35(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 18465129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of [(11)C]Choline ([(11)C]CHO) and [(18)F]Bombesin (BAY 86-4367) as Imaging Probes for Prostate Cancer in a PC-3 Prostate Cancer Xenograft Model.
Schwarzenböck SM; Schmeja P; Kurth J; Souvatzoglou M; Nawroth R; Treiber U; Kundt G; Berndt S; Graham K; Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R; Schwaiger M; Ziegler SI; Dinkelborg L; Wester HJ; Krause BJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Jun; 18(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 26483088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
