BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12051081)

  • 1. [Use of computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) and tele-mammography in preventive breast cancer screening].
    Schneider W; Heinlein P; Drexl J; Gössler A
    Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 12051081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Value of CAD systems].
    Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 12063734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Rapid neuronal filters in mammography].
    Eppler W; Stotzka R; Neiber HJ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():40-1. PubMed ID: 9859247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal IT support crucial to success in filmless department.
    Shieh YY; Roberson GH
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Apr; 22(4):55-7, 59, 61-2 passim. PubMed ID: 10915543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems].
    Stines J
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GPCALMA: a Grid-based tool for mammographic screening.
    Cerello P; Bagnasco S; Bottigli U; Cheran SC; Delogu P; Fantacci ME; Fauci F; Forni G; Lauria A; Lopez Torres E; Magro R; Masala GL; Oliva P; Palmiero R; Ramello L; Raso G; Retico A; Sitta M; Stumbo S; Tangaro S; Zanon E
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 15924184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program.
    Cupples TE; Cunningham JE; Reynolds JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 16177413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status of CAD utilizing digital mammography in Japan.
    Uchiyama N
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 20224923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Quality assurance in organized screening of breast cancer].
    De Landtsheer JP; Delaloye JF; Lepori D; De Grandi P; Levi F
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2003 May; 123(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 15095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection.
    Vyborny CJ; Doi T; O'Shaughnessy KF; Romsdahl HM; Schneider AC; Stein AA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 10831688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term retention of mammographic computer-assisted diagnosis information is neither necessary nor desirable.
    Guenin M
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):595-6; author reply 596-7. PubMed ID: 14752196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Current status and issues of digital mammography and CAD (computer aided detection)].
    Uchiyama N
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():329-32. PubMed ID: 17682174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hi-tech breast-cancer screening: will it deliver?
    Senior K
    Lancet; 2000 May; 355(9217):1796. PubMed ID: 10832837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Symposium III computer-aided diagnosis: benefits and challenges in diagnostic radiology. 4. Technical issues on developments of mammography CAD].
    Fujita H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Nov; 59(11):1347-9. PubMed ID: 14983116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
    Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluating the diagnostic quality of mammography film-screen systems: a comparative study].
    Nüssle K; Görich J; Rieber A; Brambs HJ
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):178-81. PubMed ID: 10574026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
    Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic computer-aided detection systems.
    Health Devices; 2003 Apr; 32(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 12760158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.