These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12051081)

  • 21. [Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Uchiyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jul; 62(8):409-14. PubMed ID: 12187836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic CAD markings: archive or discard?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W659. PubMed ID: 21512059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A simple technique for quality improvement of breast specimen radiography].
    Meindl S; Glöcker M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jul; 48(7):214-6. PubMed ID: 7676360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography: the R2 ImageChecker System in detection of spiculated lesions].
    Funovics M; Schamp S; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Lechner G; Wolf G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):321-4. PubMed ID: 9816642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Telecommunication--a medium for improving prenatal diagnosis and gynecologic ultrasound diagnosis? Initial experiences].
    Sohn C; Beldermann F; Wallwiener D; Lepold H; Bastert G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 9206924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Focus on computer-aided diagnosis.
    Gulsrud TO
    Health Estate; 2003 Jan; 57(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 12568055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening].
    Kido C
    Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using "voting" in CAD for mammography to lower false-positive rates.
    Prizemin Y
    Radiol Manage; 2010; 32(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 22279723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Symposium III computer-aided diagnosis: benefits and challenges in diagnostic radiology. 3. Attractive aspects and problems of CAD for mammography: from physician's viewpoints].
    Namba K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Nov; 59(11):1345-7. PubMed ID: 14983115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.
    Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns EA; Nakano C; Egger J; Carney PA; Abraham L; Taplin SH; D'Orsi CJ; Barlow W; Elmore JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 15671359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Mammography reading with CAD (computer aided detection): experiences and problems].
    Nakahara H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jun; 61(6):807-10. PubMed ID: 15995609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Conventional or digital mammography].
    Fischer U
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):552-5. PubMed ID: 11762253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Application of computer aided diagnosis (CAD) in clinical imaging. Presentation of the value and current directions in CAD development in various imaging techniques based on literature review].
    Kiszka K; Haduch J; Pasowicz M
    Przegl Lek; 2009; 66(8):437-47. PubMed ID: 20043591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of mammographic calcifications using a computer program.
    Wee WG; Moskowitz M; Chang NC; Ting YC; Pemmeraju S
    Radiology; 1975 Sep; 116(3):717-20. PubMed ID: 1098108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Categorical variables, interactions and generalized additive models. Applications in computer-aided diagnosis systems.
    Lado MJ; Cadarso-Suárez C; Roca-Pardiñas J; Tahoces PG
    Comput Biol Med; 2008 Apr; 38(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 18328470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technology and practice assessment: in search of a "desirable" statement.
    Gur D
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):659-60. PubMed ID: 15734924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Standardized image transmission. An important step in the direction of teleradiology and telemedicine].
    Walz M; Mildenberger P; Klose KJ
    Radiologe; 1999 Apr; 39(4):M77-9. PubMed ID: 10337711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.