These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12051330)

  • 1. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks.
    Evett IW; Gill PD; Jackson G; Whitaker J; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):520-30. PubMed ID: 12051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 21775236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles.
    Aitken C; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 12689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prosecutor's fallacy--a pitfall in interpreting probabilities in forensic evidence.
    Leung WC
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 11848139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of DNA profiling and behavioural science in the investigation of sexual offences.
    Davies A
    Med Sci Law; 1991 Apr; 31(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 2062204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jul; 134(2-3):196-206. PubMed ID: 12850417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA; McCrossan S
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 11094820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
    Jowett C
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns.
    Biedermann A; Champod C; Jackson G; Gill P; Taylor D; Butler J; Morling N; Hicks T; Vuille J; Taroni F
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():215. PubMed ID: 28018424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10795422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
    Bianchi L; Liò P
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.