246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12052203)
1. Dynamic QSAR techniques: applications in drug design and toxicology.
Mekenyan O
Curr Pharm Des; 2002; 8(17):1605-21. PubMed ID: 12052203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D-3D migration of large chemical inventories with conformational multiplication. Application of the genetic algorithm.
Mekenyan O; Pavlov T; Grancharov V; Todorov M; Schmieder P; Veith G
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 15807489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model.
Mekenya O; Kamenska V; Serafimova R; Poellinger L; Brouwer A; Walker J
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Oct; 13(6):579-95. PubMed ID: 12479373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology.
Perkins R; Fang H; Tong W; Welsh WJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1666-79. PubMed ID: 12924569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ensemble QSAR: a QSAR method based on conformational ensembles and metric descriptors.
Pissurlenkar RR; Khedkar VM; Iyer RP; Coutinho EC
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2204-18. PubMed ID: 21509786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design.
Roy K; Mitra I
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jul; 14(6):450-74. PubMed ID: 21521150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review.
Adhikari C; Mishra BK
Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2018; 14(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 28699497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
Mansouri K; Judson RS
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the dynamic quantitative structure-activity relationship method for modeling antibacterial activity of quinolone derivatives.
Kamenska V; Mekenyan O; Sterev A; Nedjalkova Z
Arzneimittelforschung; 1996 Apr; 46(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 8740092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of Topological, Electronic, Geometrical, Constitutional and Quantum Chemical Based Descriptors in QSAR: mPGES-1 as a Case Study.
Gupta A; Kumar V; Aparoy P
Curr Top Med Chem; 2018; 18(13):1075-1090. PubMed ID: 30027847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ligand-based prediction of active conformation by 3D-QSAR flexibility descriptors and their application in 3+3D-QSAR models.
Martinek TA; Otvös F; Dervarics M; Tóth G; Fülöp F
J Med Chem; 2005 May; 48(9):3239-50. PubMed ID: 15857130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology.
Veith GD
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):323-30. PubMed ID: 15669692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of GA-MLR for QSAR Modeling of the Arylthioindole Class of Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents.
Ahmadi S; Habibpour E
Anticancer Agents Med Chem; 2017; 17(4):552-565. PubMed ID: 27528182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
Prado-Prado FJ; González-Díaz H; de la Vega OM; Ubeira FM; Chou KC
Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 16(11):5871-80. PubMed ID: 18485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How good are ensembles in improving QSAR models? The case with eCoRIA.
Khedkar VM; Joseph J; Pissurlenkar R; Saran A; Coutinho EC
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2015; 33(4):749-69. PubMed ID: 24754910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Androgen receptor binding affinity: a QSAR evaluation.
Todorov M; Mombelli E; Ait-Aissa S; Mekenyan O
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Jun; 22(3):265-91. PubMed ID: 21598194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin sensitization: modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates.
Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Patlewicz GY; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MH; Phillips RD; Niemela J; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(4):189-204. PubMed ID: 16126613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-QSAR models on clinically relevant K103N mutant HIV-1 reverse transcriptase obtained from two strategic considerations.
San Juan AA
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2008 Feb; 18(3):1181-94. PubMed ID: 18155520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
