294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12052656)
1. The use and interpretation of in vitro data in regulatory toxicology: cosmetics, toiletries and household products.
Indans I
Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12052656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye irritation.
Eskes C; Bessou S; Bruner L; Curren R; Harbell J; Jones P; Kreiling R; Liebsch M; McNamee P; Pape W; Prinsen MK; Seidle T; Vanparys P; Worth A; Zuang V
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():47-81. PubMed ID: 16194141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation.
Macfarlane M; Jones P; Goebel C; Dufour E; Rowland J; Araki D; Costabel-Farkas M; Hewitt NJ; Hibatallah J; Kirst A; McNamee P; Schellauf F; Scheel J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 19393278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.
Pistollato F; Madia F; Corvi R; Munn S; Grignard E; Paini A; Worth A; Bal-Price A; Prieto P; Casati S; Berggren E; Bopp SK; Zuang V
Arch Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 95(6):1867-1897. PubMed ID: 33851225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: eye irritation.
McNamee P; Hibatallah J; Costabel-Farkas M; Goebel C; Araki D; Dufour E; Hewitt NJ; Jones P; Kirst A; Le Varlet B; Macfarlane M; Marrec-Fairley M; Rowland J; Schellauf F; Scheel J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 19393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternatives to the use of animals in safety testing as required by the EU-Cosmetics Directive 2009.
Vogel R
ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 19907908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse reactions to cosmetics and methods of testing.
Nigam PK
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(1):10-8; quiz 19. PubMed ID: 19172025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Currently available in vitro methods used in the regulatory toxicology.
Liebsch M; Spielmann H
Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 12052650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic products and new challenges.
Filaire E; Nachat-Kappes R; Laporte C; Harmand MF; Simon M; Poinsot C
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2022 Dec; 44(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 35842748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insights on in vitro models for safety and toxicity assessment of cosmetic ingredients.
Almeida A; Sarmento B; Rodrigues F
Int J Pharm; 2017 Mar; 519(1-2):178-185. PubMed ID: 28104405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to assess the mutagenic potential of cosmetic products without animal tests?
Speit G
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19379833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro testing strategy for assessing the skin sensitizing potential of "difficult to test" cosmetic ingredients.
Bergal M; Puginier M; Gerbeix C; Groux H; Roso A; Cottrez F; Milius A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104781. PubMed ID: 32001296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond dermal exposure: The respiratory tract as a target organ in hazard assessments of cosmetic ingredients.
Thá EL; Canavez ADPM; Schuck DC; Gagosian VSC; Lorencini M; Leme DM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Aug; 124():104976. PubMed ID: 34139277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of in vitro data into local irritation/corrosion testing strategies by means of SAR considerations: assessment of chemicals.
Gerner I; Schlede E
Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):169-75. PubMed ID: 12052655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applications of reconstructed skin models in pharmaco-toxicological trials.
Damour O; Augustin C; Black AF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Nov; 36(6):825-32. PubMed ID: 10367477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU. Reality and challenges for the toxicologist.
Pauwels M; Rogiers V
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 15177635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010.
Adler S; Basketter D; Creton S; Pelkonen O; van Benthem J; Zuang V; Andersen KE; Angers-Loustau A; Aptula A; Bal-Price A; Benfenati E; Bernauer U; Bessems J; Bois FY; Boobis A; Brandon E; Bremer S; Broschard T; Casati S; Coecke S; Corvi R; Cronin M; Daston G; Dekant W; Felter S; Grignard E; Gundert-Remy U; Heinonen T; Kimber I; Kleinjans J; Komulainen H; Kreiling R; Kreysa J; Leite SB; Loizou G; Maxwell G; Mazzatorta P; Munn S; Pfuhler S; Phrakonkham P; Piersma A; Poth A; Prieto P; Repetto G; Rogiers V; Schoeters G; Schwarz M; Serafimova R; Tähti H; Testai E; van Delft J; van Loveren H; Vinken M; Worth A; Zaldivar JM
Arch Toxicol; 2011 May; 85(5):367-485. PubMed ID: 21533817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive.
Ruet Rossignol M
Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():19-20. PubMed ID: 16194137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
