309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12052923)
1. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
Bostanci A
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct. Beijing U. issues first-ever rules.
Ding Y
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5567):448. PubMed ID: 11964449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics opinion: conflicts of interest in presentations and publications and dietetics research.
Woteki CE
J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Jan; 106(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16390663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct. Australia probes kidney researcher.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5567):449. PubMed ID: 11964450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancer researcher found guilty of negligence.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):258. PubMed ID: 12447407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct. Scandals shake Chinese science.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1464-6. PubMed ID: 16763127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Universities battle for extra funds in bid to boost quality.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6974):477. PubMed ID: 14765162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reporting of scientific misconduct in health care research].
Klasen EC; Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Aug; 146(35):1622-4. PubMed ID: 12233155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
Normile D
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
Abbott A
Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
de Jong JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. More questions about research misconduct.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrity from the top down.
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):569. PubMed ID: 12167816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Name and shame the scientific fraudsters.
McComb J
Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6730):745. PubMed ID: 10235251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Germany. Fraud investigations come up dry.
Vogel G
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):150. PubMed ID: 12855778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
Kerkhof PL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Sep; 137(36):1843. PubMed ID: 8377866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
