These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12053779)

  • 1. [Comparison of normal delivery care in the hospital and traditional care systems].
    Méndez-González RM; Cervera-Montejano MD
    Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 12053779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
    Murphy DJ; Liebling RE; Patel R; Verity L; Swingler R
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 12798481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of home delivery: a retrospective analysis.
    Tuladhar H; Dali SM; Pradhanang V
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2005; 44(159):87-91. PubMed ID: 16554861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global measures of quality- and patient safety-related childbirth outcomes: should we monitor adverse or ideal rates?
    Gregory KD; Fridman M; Shah S; Korst LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):681.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19482115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women using 2 family planning clinics].
    Canto-de Cetina T; Polanco-Reyes L; Fernández-González V; Ruiz-García S
    Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45 Supp 5():S657-61. PubMed ID: 14974277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sense and sensibility in delivery care].
    Moster D; Lie RT; Markestad T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Oct; 125(20):2818-20. PubMed ID: 16244692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Great regional differences in quality of obstetrical care].
    Pakkanen M; Lindblom B; Olausson PO; Rosén M
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(43):3320-2, 3324-5. PubMed ID: 15543954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Are there any regional differences when it comes to obstetrical care quality?].
    Finnström O; Selbing A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(45):3615; discussion 3616. PubMed ID: 15575431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of water birth on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Bodner K; Bodner-Adler B; Wierrani F; Mayerhofer K; Fousek C; Niedermayr A; Grünberger W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2002 Jun; 114(10-11):391-5. PubMed ID: 12708093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can a meta-analysis tell us about traditional birth attendant training and pregnancy outcomes?
    Sibley L; Ann Sipe T
    Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15020027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Medical-social aspects pregnancy, labor and puerperium in patients the solitary mother home in Karwowo near Szczecin].
    Rawicka I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2006; 52(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 17131852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audit of severe maternal morbidity in Uganda--implications for quality of obstetric care.
    Okong P; Byamugisha J; Mirembe F; Byaruhanga R; Bergstrom S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 16817076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparability of obstetric and perinatal data from England and Germany using standard-primip-groups - maternal and neonatal outcome].
    Schlotter CM; Wichert SA; Settatree RS; Wassmann K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Apr; 124(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 12080481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
    Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Lim A; Chongsuviwatwong V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18259902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Place of delivery among women who had antenatal care in a teaching hospital.
    Ekele BA; Tunau KA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):627-30. PubMed ID: 17464595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does maternity care improve pregnancy outcomes in women with previous complications? A study from Zimbabwe.
    Majoko F; Nystrom L; Munjanja S; Mason E; Lindmark G
    Trop Doct; 2005 Oct; 35(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 16354464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.