These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Are plain radiographs sufficient to exclude cervical spine injuries in low-risk adults? Hunter BR; Keim SM; Seupaul RA; Hern G J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 46(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 24342907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clearing the cervical spine in critically injured patients: a comprehensive C-spine protocol to avoid unnecessary delays in diagnosis. Platzer P; Jaindl M; Thalhammer G; Dittrich S; Wieland T; Vecsei V; Gaebler C Eur Spine J; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1801-10. PubMed ID: 16538521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is magnetic resonance imaging in addition to a computed tomographic scan necessary to identify clinically significant cervical spine injuries in obtunded blunt trauma patients? Fisher BM; Cowles S; Matulich JR; Evanson BG; Vega D; Dissanaike S Am J Surg; 2013 Dec; 206(6):987-93; discussion 993-4. PubMed ID: 24119886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of flexion and extension computed tomography with reconstruction in clearing the cervical spine in trauma patients: a pilot study. Wadhwa R; Shamieh S; Haydel J; Caldito G; Williams M; Nanda A J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 21250811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma. Insko EK; Gracias VH; Gupta R; Goettler CE; Gaieski DF; Dalinka MK J Trauma; 2002 Sep; 53(3):426-9. PubMed ID: 12352475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Viccellio P; Simon H; Pressman BD; Shah MN; Mower WR; Hoffman JR; Pediatrics; 2001 Aug; 108(2):E20. PubMed ID: 11483830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. Schenarts PJ; Diaz J; Kaiser C; Carrillo Y; Eddy V; Morris JA J Trauma; 2001 Oct; 51(4):663-8; discussion 668-9. PubMed ID: 11586156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new cervical spine clearance protocol using computed tomography. Barba CA; Taggert J; Morgan AS; Guerra J; Bernstein B; Lorenzo M; Gershon A; Epstein N J Trauma; 2001 Oct; 51(4):652-6; discussion 656-7. PubMed ID: 11586154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective analysis of a two-year experience using computed tomography as an adjunct for cervical spine clearance. Borock EC; Gabram SG; Jacobs LM; Murphy MA J Trauma; 1991 Jul; 31(7):1001-5; discussion 1005-6. PubMed ID: 2072419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the cervical spine: how many slices do you need? Brown CV; Foulkrod KH; Reifsnyder A; Bui E; Lopez I; Hummell M; Coopwood B Am Surg; 2010 Apr; 76(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 20420244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of plain radiographs in detecting traumatic injuries of the cervical spine in children. Nigrovic LE; Rogers AJ; Adelgais KM; Olsen CS; Leonard JR; Jaffe DM; Leonard JC; Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 May; 28(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 22531194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical computed tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma. McCulloch PT; France J; Jones DL; Krantz W; Nguyen TP; Chambers C; Dorchak J; Mucha P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2388-94. PubMed ID: 16264112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]