These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12056337)

  • 1. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres.
    Dimitrova NA; Disselhorst-Klug C; Trachterna A; Dimitrov GV; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Area-to-amplitude ratio of the terminal phase of the belly-tendon detected motor unit potentials could be used to recognize reinnervated motor units.
    Dimitrova NA; Disselhorst-Klug C; Dimitrov GV; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002; 42(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 12168247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of EMG changes with fatigue: facts, pitfalls, and fallacies.
    Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2003 Feb; 13(1):13-36. PubMed ID: 12488084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of changes in intracellular action potential on potentials recorded by single-fiber, macro, and belly-tendon electrodes.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Chakarov VE; Dimitrov AG; Dimitrova NA
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):700-12. PubMed ID: 18506714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physiological characteristics of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle across fatiguing low-level isometric contractions.
    Calder KM; Stashuk DW; McLean L
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 17113787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the size principle be detected in conventional EMG recordings?
    Ertas M; Stålberg E; Falck B
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Apr; 18(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7715629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling studies on irregular motor unit potentials.
    Zalewska E; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I; Stålberg E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):543-56. PubMed ID: 15036049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The presence of unknown layer of skin and fat is an obstacle to a correct estimation of the motor unit size from surface detected potentials.
    Dimitrov GV; Disselhorst-Klug C; Dimitrova NA; Trachterna A; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 12056338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials.
    Schulte E; Dimitrova NA; Dimitrov GV; Rau G; Disselhorst-Klug C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 15763676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in intracellular action potential profile affect parameters used in turns/amplitude analysis.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Chakarov VE; Dimitrov AG; Dimitrova NA
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 18506716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of motor unit potential analysis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
    Podnar S; Zidar J
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Oct; 34(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 16830333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The resilience of the size principle in the organization of motor unit properties in normal and reinnervated adult skeletal muscles.
    Gordon T; Thomas CK; Munson JB; Stein RB
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 82(8-9):645-61. PubMed ID: 15523522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of amplitudes of surface macro motor unit potentials recorded from various muscle sites.
    Tsubahara A; Takenaka S
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002; 42(5):313-20. PubMed ID: 12168252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topographical characteristics of motor units of the lower facial musculature revealed by means of high-density surface EMG.
    Lapatki BG; Oostenveld R; Van Dijk JP; Jonas IE; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):342-54. PubMed ID: 16000526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peculiarities of extracellular potentials produced by deep muscles. Part 2: motor unit potentials.
    Arabadzhiev TI
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Jul; 51(7):769-79. PubMed ID: 23393049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Brown WF; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Mar; 31(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.